Art for Art’s Sake:

Life in the Theatre vs. Life in the Coal Mines

Stewart, Knight: Life in the Theatre

David Mamet paints a bleak and cynical picture of Life in the Theatre in the revival of his 1977 play of the same name currently in previews at the Gerald Schoenfeld Theatre– two actors (played as well as one could expect by Patrick Stewart and T.R. Knight) are jaded and only superficially moved by the work they do. When we observe them “on stage” in the various scenes of the plays within the play, they are on auto-pilot either attempting a “poignant” but shallow and one dimensional soliloquy or slogging through predictable slapstick shtick (a zipper that won’t stay closed, a phone that rings after it is picked up, etc).

Likewise, there’s not much life before or after the theatre either as the depressed older veteran (Stewart) and the self-involved new-comer (Knight) spend an awful lot of time congratulating and complimenting each other’s scenes while putting on and taking off makeup or hanging out backstage. I found myself losing patience with the theme early on, thinking: here are talented (and privileged) artists who are making a living at their craft, albeit at the mercy of the playwright and production team (in this case Mamet and director Neil Pepe), and never seem to derive much satisfaction from their art. Worse yet, they feel trapped within their creative but unfulfilled worlds. Unfortunately, Mamet provides little substance for much empathy or indeed interest in their fate.

In The Pitmen Painters, Lee Hall, (author of Billy Elliot) paints a very different portrait on a related theme based on a true story: a group of coal miners in the late 1930s decide they want to learn more about art and hire a teacher to lecture them on art history. The teacher, Robert Lyon decides the best way to appreciate art is to experience it firsthand so he has them create their own original art and then critique each others’ works.

Despite continuing to spend nine hours a day hauling coal in the mine, the workers gradually hone their skills both in creating and critiquing art – a group of them go on to become well renowned artists known collectively as The Ashington Group. Compared to the alienated professional artists depicted in Life in the Theatre, these amateur painters were much more connected with and proud of their art. Crossing class and cultural barriers is not easy however, and not without conflict. Issues of loyalty, class consciousness, self confidence and creative freedom are woven throughout to make the theatrical experience layered and engaging. Following a successful run in the U.K. most of the original ensemble cast and director Max Roberts have joined the U.S. debut at the Manhattan Theatre Club Samuel J. Friedman Theatre.

While this particular double-header made for an interesting theatrical juxtaposition, you might want to take an intentional pass on Life in the Theatre and instead head straight for The Pitmen Painters.

Oliver Kilbourne, Baking I, Acrylic on paper

Images from The Ashington Group collection used with permission.  You can see more examples from  their collection at their web site:

www.ashingtongroup.co.uk

Published in: on October 29, 2010 at 3:56 pm  Leave a Comment  

The URI to TrackBack this entry is: https://opinion8ed2.wordpress.com/2010/10/29/art-for-arts-sake/trackback/

RSS feed for comments on this post.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: